banner

15 min read
Effects of Heavy Metal Exposure on Liver Enzyme Activities in Experimental Animals

Project Topic: Effects of Heavy Metal Exposure on Liver Enzyme Activities in Experimental Animals


Submitted by: [Your Name]

Submitted to:[Department of Biological Sciences]

Course Code:[BIO 499]

Date:[Date of Submission]


Abstract:

Heavy metal pollution represents a significant and growing global environmental health concern, with industrial, agricultural, and urban waste leading to widespread contamination. Metals like lead (Pb), cadmium (Cd), and mercury (Hg) are non-essential and toxic even at low concentrations, primarily accumulating in vital organs such as the liver. The liver, being the central site for detoxification and metabolism, is particularly vulnerable. This study aimed to investigate the hepatotoxic effects of sub-chronic exposure to lead acetate and cadmium chloride on liver enzyme activities and histological architecture in a Wistar rat model. Forty adult male rats were randomly divided into four groups of ten: a control group administered distilled water, and three experimental groups receiving low-dose lead (20 mg/kg), high-dose lead (40 mg/kg), and cadmium (5 mg/kg) via oral gavage for 28 days. At the end of the exposure period, blood samples were collected for the assessment of key liver enzymes—Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT), Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST), and Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP). Liver tissues were harvested for histological examination using hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining. Results indicated a statistically significant (p < 0.05) dose-dependent increase in serum ALT, AST, and ALP activities in all treated groups compared to the control, with the high-dose lead and cadmium groups showing the most pronounced elevations. Histopathological analysis revealed marked hepatic damage, including hepatocellular necrosis, inflammatory cell infiltration, sinusoidal congestion, and fatty changes in the metal-exposed groups. These biochemical and morphological alterations confirm that heavy metal exposure induces significant hepatotoxicity, disrupting cellular integrity and metabolic functions. The study underscores the critical role of liver enzymes as sensitive biomarkers for heavy metal-induced toxicity and highlights the urgent need for stricter environmental regulations and public health interventions to mitigate exposure. The findings also provide a foundational model for further research into protective agents against heavy metal toxicity.



Keywords: Heavy Metals, Hepatotoxicity, Liver Enzymes (ALT, AST, ALP), Lead, Cadmium, Wistar Rats, Histopathology, Environmental Toxicology.


Table of Contents:


Abstract

Acknowledgements

List of Figures

List of Tables

List of Abbreviations


Chapter One: Introduction

1.1.Background of the Study

1.2.Statement of the Problem

1.3.Aim of the Study

1.4.Specific Objectives

1.5.Research Questions

1.6.Significance of the Study

1.7.Scope and Limitations of the Study

1.8.Operational Definition of Terms


Chapter Two: Literature Review

2.1.Heavy Metals: Sources and Environmental Persistence

2.2.Toxicokinetics of Lead and Cadmium: Absorption, Distribution, and Accumulation

2.3.The Liver: Architecture and Vital Functions

2.4.Liver Enzymes as Biomarkers of Hepatotoxicity

2.4.1. Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT)

2.4.2. Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST)

2.4.3. Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP)

2.5.Mechanisms of Heavy Metal-Induced Hepatotoxicity

2.5.1. Oxidative Stress and Lipid Peroxidation

2.5.2. Mitochondrial Dysfunction

2.5.3. Disruption of Calcium Homeostasis

2.5.4. Apoptosis and Necrosis

2.6.Review of Previous Experimental Studies

2.7.Knowledge Gap and Justification for the Present Study


Chapter Three: Materials and Methods

3.1.Study Design

3.2.Experimental Animals and Ethical Approval

3.3.Chemicals and Reagents

3.4.Animal Grouping and Administration of Heavy Metals

3.5.Sample Collection and Preparation

3.6.Biochemical Analysis of Serum Liver Enzymes

3.6.1. ALT Assay Protocol

3.6.2. AST Assay Protocol

3.6.3. ALP Assay Protocol

3.7.Histopathological Examination

3.7.1. Tissue Fixation and Processing

3.7.2. Staining and Microscopic Analysis

3.8.Statistical Analysis


Chapter Four: Results and Discussion

4.1.Presentation of Results

4.1.1. Clinical Observations and Morbidity

4.1.2. Effects on Body Weight and Liver Weight

4.1.3. Serum Liver Enzyme Activities (ALT, AST, ALP)

4.1.4. Histopathological Findings

4.2.Discussion of Findings

4.2.1. Interpretation of Biochemical Alterations

4.2.2. Correlation between Enzyme Elevation and Tissue Damage

4.2.3. Comparative Toxicity of Lead vs. Cadmium

4.2.4. Mechanisms Underlying the Observed Hepatotoxicity

4.2.5. Relevance to Human Health and Environmental Risk Assessment


Chapter Five: Conclusion and Recommendations

5.1.Summary of Key Findings

5.2.Conclusion

5.3.Recommendations

5.3.1. Policy and Public Health Recommendations

5.3.2. Recommendations for Future Research

5.4.Contribution to Knowledge


References

Appendices

Appendix A: Animal Ethical Clearance Certificate

Appendix B: Standard Curves for Biochemical Assays

Appendix C: Raw Data Sheet

Appendix D: Photomicrographs of Liver Sections



Chapter One: Introduction

1.1. Background of the Study

Hello and welcome to this exploration of a pressing environmental health issue!Our modern world, with all its advancements, grapples with the unintended consequence of pollution. Among the various pollutants, heavy metals like lead, cadmium, mercury, and arsenic stand out due to their toxicity, persistence, and ability to bioaccumulate in living organisms. These metals enter our ecosystems through mining, industrial effluents, agricultural pesticides, and electronic waste, eventually finding their way into the food chain and water supplies. The liver, our body's primary chemical processing plant, is a major target for these toxicants. It works tirelessly to filter blood, metabolize nutrients, and neutralize toxins, making it exceptionally vulnerable to damage. When heavy metals accumulate in liver cells (hepatocytes), they can disrupt delicate biochemical pathways, leading to cell injury or death. One of the earliest and most measurable signs of this injury is the leakage of specific enzymes—ALT, AST, and ALP—from damaged hepatocytes into the bloodstream. By studying these changes in controlled experimental settings, we can better understand the risks and mechanisms of heavy metal toxicity, providing crucial data to protect both environmental and human health.


1.2. Statement of the Problem

Despite increasing awareness and regulation,heavy metal contamination remains pervasive, posing a silent threat to public health. Communities living near industrial zones, agricultural lands, and unsafe waste disposal sites are at continuous risk of exposure. The liver, being the frontline detox organ, suffers immensely, but the precise relationship between sub-chronic exposure levels (mirroring real-world scenarios) and the degree of hepatic injury is not fully characterized. Furthermore, comparative studies on the hepatotoxic potency of common metals like lead and cadmium using consistent experimental parameters are needed. This project seeks to address these gaps by systematically evaluating how exposure to different doses of lead and cadmium affects the functional and structural integrity of the liver in an animal model.


1.3. Aim of the Study

The broad aim of this study is to investigate and compare the hepatotoxic effects of lead and cadmium exposure on liver enzyme activities and histology in experimental Wistar rats.


1.4. Specific Objectives:

1. To determine the serum activity levels of Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT), Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST), and Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP) in rats exposed to lead acetate and cadmium chloride.

2. To assess the histopathological changes in the liver tissues of exposed rats compared to the control group.

3. To compare the degree of hepatotoxicity induced by lead and cadmium at the administered doses.


1.5. Research Questions:

1. Does sub-chronic exposure to lead and cadmium cause a significant elevation in serum ALT, AST, and ALP activities in Wistar rats?

2. What are the characteristic histopathological alterations in the liver induced by these heavy metals?

3. Which of the two metals, at the chosen doses, induces more severe hepatotoxicity based on biochemical and histological markers?


1.6. Significance of the Study

This research is significant for several reasons.For the scientific community, it adds to the body of literature on experimental toxicology, providing clear data on dose-response relationships. For medical and public health practitioners, it reinforces the understanding of liver enzymes as reliable, early-warning biomarkers for heavy metal poisoning. For environmental agencies and policymakers, the findings can serve as compelling evidence to advocate for stricter contamination controls and remediation efforts. Finally, for students like us, it is a valuable exercise in rigorous scientific methodology, bridging classroom theory with hands-on laboratory investigation.



1.7. Scope and Limitations

The study is scoped to a 28-day sub-chronic exposure period using two specific heavy metals(lead and cadmium) on adult male Wistar rats. The focus is on hepatic effects, primarily through biochemical enzyme assays and basic histopathology. Limitations include: the use of an animal model, meaning findings must be extrapolated to humans with caution; the examination of only two metals, excluding potential synergistic effects with other toxins; and the use of a single exposure route (oral), whereas human exposure can be multi-route (inhalation, dermal). Financial and time constraints also limited the number of biomarkers and advanced molecular techniques that could be employed.


1.8. Operational Definition of Terms:

· Heavy Metals: Dense, toxic metallic elements (Pb, Cd in this study) with potential environmental and biological toxicity.

· Hepatotoxicity: Chemical-driven damage to the liver.

· ALT (Alanine Aminotransferase): An enzyme primarily found in the liver, whose serum level increases with hepatocellular injury.

· AST (Aspartate Aminotransferase): An enzyme found in liver, heart, and muscles; elevated in liver and other tissue damage.

· ALP (Alkaline Phosphatase): An enzyme related to the bile ducts; elevation often indicates cholestasis (impaired bile flow).

· Sub-chronic Exposure: Repeated exposure over an intermediate duration (usually 1-3 months in rodents).


Chapter Two: Literature Review


2.1 Introduction:

This chapter provides a comprehensive examination of existing literature on heavy metal toxicity, with particular focus on hepatic effects. It establishes the theoretical framework for the present study by exploring the sources and toxicokinetics of lead and cadmium, the physiological role of the liver, the significance of liver enzymes as biomarkers, and the molecular mechanisms underlying heavy metal-induced hepatotoxicity. This review synthesizes current knowledge and identifies the specific research gap this study aims to address.


2.2 Heavy Metals: Environmental Context and Toxicological Significance:

Heavy metals are defined as metallic elements with a density greater than 5 g/cm³ (Tchounwou et al., 2012). While some, like zinc and copper, are essential micronutrients, others—notably lead (Pb), cadmium (Cd), mercury (Hg), and arsenic (As)—are non-essential and exhibit toxicity even at minimal concentrations. Their environmental persistence, capacity for bioaccumulation in living organisms, and biomagnification through the food chain render them significant global pollutants (Jaishankar et al., 2014).

Anthropogenic activities are the primary contributors to environmental heavy metal loads. Key sources include:

· Industrial Processes: Mining, smelting, electroplating, and battery manufacturing.

· Agricultural Practices: Use of phosphate fertilizers, sewage sludge, and metal-based pesticides.

· Urbanization: Vehicle emissions (historically from leaded gasoline), wear of tires and brakes, and improper disposal of electronic waste (e-waste).

· Natural Sources: Volcanic activity and geological weathering, though these contribute a smaller fraction compared to human activities.

The environmental stability of metals like lead and cadmium means they do not undergo microbial or chemical degradation. They accumulate in soils and sediments, entering aquatic systems and ultimately the food web, creating long-term exposure risks for ecosystems and human populations (Satarug et al., 2010).


2.3 Toxicokinetics of Lead and Cadmium:

Understanding the absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion (ADME) of these metals is crucial to comprehending their toxicity.


2.3.1 Lead (Pb)

· Absorption: Inorganic lead is absorbed primarily via the respiratory tract (30-40% of inhaled particles) and the gastrointestinal tract (5-15% in adults, up to 50% in children). Dermal absorption is generally low (WHO, 2021).

· Distribution: In blood, 99% of lead is bound to erythrocytes. It distributes widely, accumulating in mineralizing tissues (bones and teeth) and soft tissues, particularly the liver, kidneys, and brain. Its half-life in blood is about 30 days, but in bone, it can be decades.

· Excretion: Principally renal (urine) and biliary (feces).


2.3.2 Cadmium (Cd)

· Absorption: Gastrointestinal absorption is low (3-5%) but is influenced by nutritional factors like iron and calcium deficiency. Inhalation absorption is much higher (10-50%).

· Distribution: Cadmium has a strong affinity for metallothionein (MT), a cysteine-rich protein. The Cd-MT complex is filtered by the kidneys and reabsorbed in the proximal tubules, leading to significant renal accumulation. The liver and kidneys together contain about 50% of the total body burden (Satarug et al., 2010).

· Excretion: Very slow, with a biological half-life estimated at 10-30 years in humans, leading to cumulative exposure.


2.4 The Liver: Architecture and Physiological Functions:

The liver is the largest internal organ and the central hub of metabolism and detoxification. Its structural and functional unit is the hepatic lobule, organized around a central vein with hepatocyte plates radiating outward, interspersed with sinusoids (Wang & Zhu, 2019).


Key functions relevant to this study include:

· Detoxification: Metabolism of xenobiotics (foreign compounds) via Phase I (cytochrome P450 enzymes) and Phase II (conjugation) reactions.

· Protein Synthesis: Production of albumin, clotting factors, and enzymes.

· Metabolic Regulation: Glycogen storage, gluconeogenesis, and lipid metabolism.

· Bile Production: Essential for digestion and excretion of waste products, including conjugated toxins.

This central role makes the liver highly susceptible to injury from blood-borne toxins like heavy metals.


2.5 Liver Enzymes as Biomarkers of Hepatotoxicity:

Serum enzyme assays are cornerstone clinical and experimental tools for assessing hepatocellular integrity and biliary function. Leakage of intracellular enzymes into the bloodstream indicates damage to cell membranes or cell death.

2.5.1 Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT; EC 2.6.1.2)

ALT catalyzes the transfer of an amino group from alanine to alpha-ketoglutarate,producing pyruvate and glutamate. It is primarily cytosolic and exhibits the highest concentration in hepatocytes. Its serum activity is considered a specific marker for hepatocellular injury, as significant elevations are predominantly of hepatic origin (Giannini et al., 2005).


2.5.2 Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST; EC 2.6.1.1)

AST catalyzes the transfer of an amino group from aspartate to alpha-ketoglutarate.It is found in both the cytosol and mitochondria. While elevated in liver disease, it is also present in significant concentrations in cardiac muscle, skeletal muscle, kidneys, and brain, making it a less liver-specific marker than ALT. The AST/ALT ratio can sometimes provide diagnostic clues.


2.5.3 Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP; EC 3.1.3.1)

ALP is a group of enzymes that hydrolyze phosphate esters in an alkaline environment.Hepatic ALP is located on the canalicular membrane of hepatocytes and in epithelial cells of the bile ducts. Elevated serum ALP activity is primarily associated with cholestasis (obstruction of bile flow) and biliary epithelial damage, though it is also present in bone and placenta (Sharma et al., 2014).

In heavy metal toxicity, a combined elevation of these enzymes suggests a pattern of mixed hepatocellular and cholestatic injury.


2.6 Mechanisms of Heavy Metal-Induced Hepatotoxicity

Heavy metals induce liver damage through interconnected molecular pathways, culminating in oxidative stress, inflammation, and cell death.


2.6.1 Oxidative Stress and Lipid Peroxidation

This is the central mechanism.Heavy metals like Pb and Cd can directly generate reactive oxygen species (ROS) such as superoxide anion (O₂•⁻), hydroxyl radical (•OH), and hydrogen peroxide (H₂O₂) via Fenton-like and Haber-Weiss reactions. More importantly, they deplete endogenous antioxidants (glutathione, superoxide dismutase, catalase) and inhibit their synthesis (Matović et al., 2015). The resulting oxidative imbalance leads to:

· Lipid Peroxidation: ROS attack polyunsaturated fatty acids in cell membranes, forming toxic malondialdehyde (MDA), compromising membrane fluidity and integrity.

· Protein Oxidation: Alteration of enzyme function and structure.

· DNA Damage: Leading to mutagenesis and impaired cellular function.


2.6.2 Mitochondrial Dysfunction

Mitochondria are prime targets.Metals accumulate in mitochondria, inhibiting electron transport chain complexes (I-IV), uncoupling oxidative phosphorylation, and reducing ATP production. This bioenergetic crisis can trigger the mitochondrial permeability transition pore (MPTP) opening, leading to cytochrome c release and initiation of apoptosis (Wang & Wei, 2020).


2.6.3 Disruption of Calcium Homeostasis

Heavy metals interfere with calcium(Ca²⁺) signaling by inhibiting Ca²⁺-ATPase pumps and inducing release from intracellular stores. Elevated cytosolic Ca²⁺ activates proteases, phospholipases, and endonucleases, exacerbating cellular damage and promoting both apoptotic and necrotic cell death pathways (Bridges & Zalups, 2005).


2.6.4 Induction of Apoptosis and Necrosis

Sustained oxidative stress and mitochondrial dysfunction activate intrinsic apoptotic pathways(via caspase-9 and -3). Concurrently, severe ATP depletion and overwhelming membrane damage can lead to uncontrolled necrosis. Histologically, this manifests as coagulative necrosis, inflammatory infiltration, and loss of hepatic architecture.


2.7 Review of Previous Experimental Studies:

Numerous in vivo studies corroborate the hepatotoxic effects of lead and cadmium.

· Lead Studies: Liu et al. (2012) reported a dose-dependent increase in serum ALT and AST in rats exposed to 50-200 mg/L lead acetate in drinking water for 8 weeks, accompanied by hepatic histopathology showing vacuolization and necrosis.

· Cadmium Studies: El-Boshy et al. (2015) demonstrated that exposure to 5 mg/kg CdCl₂ for 4 weeks in rats significantly elevated ALT, AST, ALP, and induced severe histopathological lesions including sinusoidal dilatation and inflammatory infiltration.

· Comparative Studies: A study by Al-Azemi et al. (2010) suggested that cadmium may be more potent than lead in inducing oxidative stress and hepatic damage at equivalent exposure levels.


2.8 Knowledge Gap and Justification for Present Study:

While the hepatotoxicity of individual metals is well-documented, direct comparative studies under standardized experimental conditions (same species, age, sex, exposure duration, and route) are less common. Furthermore, many studies focus on either biochemistry or histopathology, rather than a fully integrated analysis. There is also a need for studies employing sub-chronic exposure models that more closely mimic real-world, low-level continuous exposure scenarios rather than acute poisoning.


This study is therefore justified as it aims to:

1. Directly compare the hepatotoxic potency of lead and cadmium under a standardized sub-chronic exposure protocol.

2. Correlate quantitative biochemical markers (ALT, AST, ALP) with qualitative histopathological findings in a single experimental model.

3. Provide consolidated data that reinforces the use of liver enzyme panels as sensitive biomarkers for environmental heavy metal risk assessment.


Chapter Three: Materials and Methods


3.1 Study Design:

This study employed a completely randomized experimental design. It was a controlled laboratory investigation conducted over a period of eight weeks, including a four-week acclimatization and experimental exposure phase, followed by a one-week sample collection and analysis phase. The independent variables were the type and dose of heavy metal administered. The dependent variables were the serum activities of liver enzymes (ALT, AST, ALP) and the histopathological score of liver tissues.


3.2 Experimental Animals and Ethical Consideration:

· Species and Strain: Forty (40) healthy adult male albino rats of the Wistar strain (Rattus norvegicus).

· Rationale for Choice: Males were selected to eliminate hormonal variability associated with the estrous cycle. Wistar rats are a standard, well-characterized model in toxicological research.

· Age & Weight: 10-12 weeks old, with an initial body weight of 150-180g.

· Source & Acclimatization: Animals were procured from the University of [Your University] Animal House. They were acclimatized for two weeks under standard laboratory conditions: temperature (22±2°C), relative humidity (55±5%), and a 12-hour light/dark cycle.

· Husbandry: Rats were housed in sanitized polypropylene cages (4 rats/cage) with sterile paddy husk bedding. Standard rodent pellet diet and water were provided ad libitum.

· Ethical Approval: The study protocol was reviewed and approved by the Institutional Animal Ethics Committee (IAEC) of [Your University] (Ref No: [Fictional No.]/IAEC/2024). All procedures adhered to the "Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals" (NIH, 2011).


3.3 Chemicals and Reagents:

· Lead (II) Acetate Trihydrate (Pb(CH₃COO)₂·3H₂O), Sigma-Aldrich, purity ≥99.5%.

· Cadmium Chloride (CdCl₂), Sigma-Aldrich, purity ≥99%.

· Commercial Diagnostic Kits for ALT, AST, and ALP (Span Diagnostics Ltd., India).

· 10% Neutral Buffered Formalin for tissue fixation.

· Hematoxylin and Eosin (H&E) staining reagents.

· All other chemicals and solvents used were of analytical grade.


3.4 Animal Grouping and Administration of Heavy Metals:

After acclimatization, rats were randomly assigned into four groups (n=10 per group) using a random number table.

· Group I (Control): Received 1 mL/kg body weight of distilled water daily via oral gavage.

· Group II (Low-Dose Pb): Received Lead Acetate at 20 mg/kg body weight/day in distilled water via oral gavage.

· Group III (High-Dose Pb): Received Lead Acetate at 40 mg/kg body weight/day via oral gavage.

· Group IV (Cd): Received Cadmium Chloride at 5 mg/kg body weight/day via oral gavage.

Dose Justification: Doses were selected based on preliminary studies and previous literature to induce measurable sub-chronic toxicity without causing excessive mortality (El-Boshy et al., 2015; Liu et al., 2012). The exposure period was 28 consecutive days.


3.5 Sample Collection and Preparation:

· Body Weight: Measured weekly.

· Blood Collection: 24 hours after the final dose, animals were anesthetized with mild diethyl ether. Blood was collected via retro-orbital plexus puncture into plain serum separator tubes.

· Serum Separation: Blood was allowed to clot for 30 minutes at room temperature, then centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 15 minutes. Clear serum was aspirated and stored at -20°C until analysis.

· Sacrifice and Organ Harvest: After blood collection, animals were euthanized by cervical dislocation under deep anesthesia. The liver was rapidly excised, washed in ice-cold normal saline, blotted dry, and weighed for the calculation of the relative liver weight (Liver weight/Body weight x 100%). A section of the median lobe was fixed in 10% formalin for histology.


3.6 Biochemical Analysis of Serum Liver Enzymes:

All enzyme assays were performed using commercial spectrophotometric kits according to the manufacturer's instructions on a semi-auto analyzer (RAYTO RT-9200). Assays were performed in duplicate.


3.6.1 ALT Assay Principle (IFCC Method):

ALT catalyzes:L-Alanine + α-Ketoglutarate → Pyruvate + L-Glutamate. The pyruvate formed reacts with 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazine to form a colored hydrazone, measured at 546 nm. Activity is expressed in International Units per liter (U/L).


3.6.2 AST Assay Principle (IFCC Method):

AST catalyzes:L-Aspartate + α-Ketoglutarate → Oxaloacetate + L-Glutamate. The oxaloacetate formed reacts with 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazine, measured at 546 nm. Activity expressed in U/L.


3.6.3 ALP Assay Principle (AMP Buffer Method):

ALP hydrolyzes para-Nitrophenyl Phosphate(p-NPP) to para-Nitrophenol (p-NP) and phosphate. The rate of formation of yellow-colored p-NP, measured at 405 nm, is proportional to ALP activity. Activity expressed in U/L.


3.7 Histopathological Examination

1. Tissue Processing: Formalin-fixed tissues were processed through a graded ethanol series (70%, 80%, 90%, 100%), cleared in xylene, and embedded in paraffin wax.

2. Sectioning: Sections of 5 μm thickness were cut using a rotary microtome (Leica RM2125 RTS).

3. Staining: Sections were dewaxed, rehydrated, and stained with standard Hematoxylin and Eosin (H&E) protocol.

4. Microscopic Analysis: Stained sections were examined under a light microscope (Olympus CX23) at 100x, 400x, and 1000x magnification by a pathologist blinded to the treatment groups. Photomicrographs were taken with a digital camera (Olympus DP27). Lesions were semi-quantitatively scored:

   · 0: Normal architecture.

   · 1 (+): Mild (focal necrosis, mild inflammation).

   · 2 (++): Moderate (multifocal necrosis, moderate inflammation, vacuolization).

   · 3 (+++): Severe (diffuse necrosis, severe inflammation, hemorrhage, architectural distortion).


3.8 Statistical Analysis:

Data were expressed as Mean ± Standard Error of the Mean (SEM). Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism software (Version 9.0). Normality of data was assessed using the Shapiro-Wilk test. For parametric data, one-way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) was applied, followed by Tukey's post-hoc test for multiple comparisons. For non-parametric histopathological scores, the Kruskal-Wallis test followed by Dunn's post-hoc test was used. A p-value of less than 0.05 (p < 0.05) was considered statistically significant.


Chapter Four: Results and Discussion


4.1 Presentation of Results

4.1.1 Clinical Observations, Mortality, and Body Weight

No mortality was recorded in any group during the study period.Animals in control Group I remained active and healthy throughout. Rats in heavy metal-treated groups (II, III, IV) exhibited signs of toxicity from the second week onwards, including reduced locomotor activity, piloerection, and reduced food and water intake. The high-dose Pb (III) and Cd (IV) groups showed the most pronounced symptoms.


Table 1: Effect on Final Body Weight and Relative Liver Weight

Group Final Body Weight (g) Relative Liver Weight (%)

I (Control) 198.5 ± 5.2 3.15 ± 0.08

II (Pb 20 mg/kg) 182.3 ± 4.8* 3.42 ± 0.10*

III (Pb 40 mg/kg) 170.1 ± 6.1** 3.65 ± 0.12**

IV (Cd 5 mg/kg) 165.8 ± 5.5** 3.78 ± 0.15**


*Values are Mean ± SEM; n=10. *p<0.05, *p<0.01 vs. Control (ANOVA, Tukey's test).

A significant decrease in final body weight was observed in all treatment groups compared to control, indicating systemic toxicity and reduced growth/feeding. Conversely, relative liver weight increased significantly, suggesting organ enlargement (hepatomegaly) due to inflammation, fatty change, or cellular edema.


4.1.2 Serum Liver Enzyme Activities

Table 2: Serum Liver Enzyme Activities (U/L)

Group ALT (U/L) AST (U/L) ALP (U/L)

I (Control) 42.3 ± 2.1 85.6 ± 3.4 125.4 ± 6.8

II (Pb 20 mg/kg) 68.5 ± 3.8* 132.7 ± 5.9* 180.2 ± 8.5*

III (Pb 40 mg/kg) 112.4 ± 6.5** 198.3 ± 9.2** 265.7 ± 12.1**

IV (Cd 5 mg/kg) 145.8 ± 8.2**† 235.6 ± 11.4**† 310.5 ± 14.6**†


*Values are Mean ± SEM; n=10. *p<0.05, *p<0.01 vs. Control; †p<0.05 vs. Group III (ANOVA, Tukey's test).

The results demonstrate a clear dose-dependent increase in serum ALT, AST, and ALP activities in lead-exposed groups (II & III). Cadmium exposure (Group IV) at 5 mg/kg caused elevations that were statistically greater than those in the high-dose lead group (40 mg/kg) for all three enzymes, indicating its superior hepatotoxic potency at the administered doses.


4.1.3 Histopathological Findings:

· Group I (Control): Normal hepatic architecture with intact hepatocyte cords radiating from the central vein. Hepatocytes displayed uniform cytoplasm and prominent, central nuclei. No necrosis, inflammation, or fatty change was observed (Fig 1A, Score: 0).

· Group II (Low-Dose Pb): Mild histopathological changes, including focal areas of hepatocellular vacuolization (indicative of fatty change) and occasional necrotic hepatocytes. Mild inflammatory cell infiltration was noted in portal areas (Fig 1B, Score: 1+).

· Group III (High-Dose Pb): Moderate to severe damage. Features included multifocal coagulative necrosis, pronounced hydropic degeneration (swelling), marked inflammatory infiltration (predominantly lymphocytes), and sinusoidal congestion (Fig 1C, Score: 2+ to 3+).

· Group IV (Cd): The most severe architectural disruption. Findings included extensive diffuse necrosis, loss of hepatocyte cord arrangement, severe inflammatory cell infiltration, hemorrhage, and prominent cytoplasmic vacuolization. Bile duct hyperplasia was also noted in some areas (Fig 1D, Score: 3+).


4.2 Discussion of Findings

4.2.1 Interpretation of Biochemical Alterations

The significant elevation of serum ALT and AST is a classic indicator of hepatocellular injury.The leakage of these cytosolic and mitochondrial enzymes into circulation directly reflects increased permeability or rupture of hepatocyte plasma membranes due to heavy metal-induced damage (Giannini et al., 2005). The rise in ALP, particularly pronounced in the cadmium group, suggests concurrent injury to the biliary epithelium, pointing towards a cholestatic component in the hepatotoxicity. This is consistent with studies showing cadmium's affinity to disrupt bile canalicular function (El-Boshy et al., 2015).

The dose-response relationship observed with lead exposure aligns with the fundamental principle of toxicology. The significantly higher enzyme levels in the cadmium group compared to the high-dose lead group, despite a lower molar dose, underscore cadmium's exceptional toxic potential. This can be attributed to its extremely long biological half-life, high rate of hepatic accumulation, and potent induction of oxidative stress (Satarug et al., 2010).


4.2.2 Correlation Between Enzyme Elevation and Tissue Damage

The histopathological findings provide the morphological correlate to the biochemical data.The progressive severity of lesions—from focal vacuolization in low-dose lead to diffuse necrosis in cadmium-exposed livers—perfectly mirrors the gradation in serum enzyme levels. This strong correlation validates the use of ALT, AST, and ALP as reliable, sensitive, and early indicators of hepatic damage in heavy metal toxicity screening. The observed hepatomegaly (increased relative liver weight) is likely due to a combination of cellular edema, inflammatory cell influx, and fatty infiltration.


4.2.3 Comparative Toxicity of Lead vs. Cadmium

The results clearly indicate that,under the conditions of this study, cadmium was more hepatotoxic than lead. The 5 mg/kg Cd dose induced damage equivalent to or greater than 40 mg/kg of Pb. This heightened toxicity can be explained by several factors:

1. Bioaccumulation: Cadmium's sequestration by metallothionein in the liver leads to high and persistent intracellular concentrations.

2. Oxidative Stress Potency: Cadmium is a more potent inducer of ROS and a more effective depletor of glutathione than lead (Matović et al., 2015).

3. Mitochondrial Affinity: Cadmium has a high affinity for mitochondrial membranes, causing more severe bioenergetic failure.


4.2.4 Underlying Mechanisms

The observed biochemical and histological damage is consistent with the mechanistic framework outlined in Chapter 2.The heavy metals likely initiated a cascade of events: (1) Generation of ROS and depletion of antioxidants, leading to oxidative stress; (2) Oxidation of lipids and proteins, compromising membrane integrity (enzyme leakage); (3) Mitochondrial damage, reducing ATP and triggering apoptosis/necrosis (histological necrosis); (4) Inflammatory response to cellular debris (histological infiltration). Cadmium's additional effect on ALP and bile ducts suggests specific targeting of cholangiocytes.


4.2.5 Relevance to Human Health and Environmental Risk Assessment

This experimental model provides crucial insights for human health.The sub-chronic, low-to-moderate dose exposure mirrors real-world scenarios where populations are exposed to contaminated water or food over extended periods. The study confirms that even at levels that do not cause acute poisoning, sustained exposure to lead and cadmium can inflict substantial subclinical liver damage. This silent injury, if unchecked, could progress to chronic liver disease, increase susceptibility to other hepatotoxins, or exacerbate pre-existing conditions. Public health strategies must therefore focus not only on preventing acute poisoning but also on minimizing long-term, low-level environmental exposure through stringent regulations on industrial discharge, soil remediation, and continuous monitoring of food and water supplies.


Chapter Five: Conclusion and Recommendations

5.1. Summary of Key Findings

This project set out to explore the effects of heavy metal exposure on the liver.Over a 28-day period, we observed that Wistar rats exposed to lead acetate and cadmium chloride exhibited clear signs of liver distress. Biochemically, there was a significant and dose-dependent hike in the serum levels of our key marker enzymes—ALT, AST, and ALP. This was not just a number on a chart; it told a story of leaking enzymes from injured liver cells. The story was confirmed under the microscope. The beautiful, orderly architecture of the healthy liver was disrupted in the treated groups, showing visible injury like cell death, inflammation, and fatty deposits. The damage was more pronounced in the high-dose lead and cadmium groups, with cadmium showing particularly severe effects at a relatively lower dose, highlighting its potent toxicity.


5.2. Conclusion

In conclusion,the findings from this study robustly demonstrate that sub-chronic exposure to lead and cadmium induces significant hepatotoxicity in experimental rats. The elevated serum activities of ALT, AST, and ALP serve as sensitive biochemical indicators of this damage, which is corroborated by clear histopathological evidence of hepatic lesions. The study confirms that the liver is a critical target organ for heavy metal toxicity and that these environmental contaminants can severely compromise its vital functions. Cadmium, in our experimental setup, appeared to exert a more potent toxic effect on the liver compared to lead at the administered concentrations. This research solidifies the link between environmental heavy metal pollution and direct physiological harm, urging for heightened awareness and action.


5.3. Recommendations


5.3.1. Policy and Public Health Recommendations:


1. Environmental Monitoring: Regulatory bodies should intensify the monitoring of heavy metal levels in water, soil, and food, especially in high-risk industrial and agricultural zones.

2. Public Awareness: Health agencies should launch community education programs on sources of heavy metal exposure and preventive measures, such as using certified water filters and consuming food from safe sources.

3. Occupational Safety: Stricter enforcement of safety protocols and regular health screenings, including liver function tests, for workers in industries involving heavy metals.


5.3.2. Recommendations for Future Research:


1. Long-term Studies: Investigate the effects of chronic, low-dose exposure over a more extended period to mimic real-life human exposure scenarios better.

2. Protective Studies: Explore the efficacy of potential hepatoprotective agents (like antioxidants, chelators, or herbal extracts) against heavy metal-induced damage using this model.

3. Molecular Exploration: Future studies should employ molecular techniques (e.g., PCR, Western Blot) to examine gene expression and protein levels related to oxidative stress (like superoxide dismutase, glutathione) and apoptosis (like caspase-3) to delineate the precise mechanistic pathways.

4. Multi-metal and Synergistic Studies: Examine the combined effects of exposure to lead, cadmium, and other prevalent metals to understand potential synergistic toxicities.


5.4. Contribution to Knowledge

This project contributes to the field of environmental toxicology by providing empirical,comparative data on the hepatotoxic profiles of lead and cadmium in a standardized mammalian model. It reinforces the validity of serum liver enzymes as accessible biomarkers for toxicity screening. The detailed histological record adds a visual dimension to the quantitative biochemical data, offering a comprehensive view of the injury. Ultimately, this work adds another brick to the wall of evidence necessary to drive environmental protection and public health policy forward.


References:


(Formatted in APA 7th Edition Style)

1. Jaishankar, M., Tseten, T., Anbalagan, N., Mathew, B. B., & Beeregowda, K. N. (2014). Toxicity, mechanism and health effects of some heavy metals. Interdisciplinary Toxicology, 7(2), 60–72.

2. Matović, V., Buha, A., Ðukić-Ćosić, D., & Bulat, Z. (2015). Insight into the oxidative stress induced by lead and/or cadmium in blood, liver and kidneys. Food and Chemical Toxicology, 78, 130–140.

3. Rana, M. N., Tangpong, J., & Rahman, M. M. (2018). Toxicodynamics of lead, cadmium, mercury and arsenic- induced kidney toxicity and treatment strategy: A mini review. Toxicology Reports, 5, 704–713.

4. Satarug, S., Garrett, S. H., Sens, M. A., & Sens, D. A. (2010). Cadmium, environmental exposure, and health outcomes. Environmental Health Perspectives, 118(2), 182–190.

5. Tchounwou, P. B., Yedjou, C. G., Patlolla, A. K., & Sutton, D. J. (2012). Heavy metal toxicity and the environment. Experientia Supplementum, 101, 133–164.

6. Wang, J., & Zhu, H. (2019). The Role of the Liver in Drug Metabolism. In Liver Pathophysiology (pp. 583-594). Academic Press.

7. World Health Organization (WHO). (2021). Lead poisoning. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/lead-poisoning-and-health

8. Zaki, H. A., El-Beltagy, M. A., & El-Sayed, R. M. (2022). Hepatoprotective effect of curcumin against lead acetate toxicity: involvement of antioxidant and anti-inflammatory mechanisms. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(14), 20500–20513.